THE BUYING RESEARCH DESKScope. Responsibility. Full cost.
03 / Comparisons

Which service category fits which problem?

Section 03Page 1 of 12Last updated 20 October 2026
Evidence in viewRT / comparisons / 01
01Option
Security software, such as EDR
02Work it is intended to cover
Technical collection, prevention and detection capabilities
03When it fits
Your team can configure, investigate and respond
04Work to verify separately
Staffing, identity/cloud coverage, forensic support
05Common buying mistake
Assuming automation means staffed ownership
First entry from the research table. Read the complete comparison and qualifications below.
Option Work it is intended to cover When it fits Work to verify separately Common buying mistake
Security software, such as EDR Technical collection, prevention and detection capabilities Your team can configure, investigate and respond Staffing, identity/cloud coverage, forensic support Assuming automation means staffed ownership
MDR Managed detection, investigation and agreed response Your internal team needs operating coverage Sources, permissions, remediation and recovery Treating every incident task as included
Broader MSSP A contracted selection of security operations You need several managed security functions Exact schedule and hand-offs for each function Buying the category label instead of the scope
IT MSP with security services IT operation plus specified security tasks Consolidated delivery suits your environment Separation of duties, security depth, escalation Assuming all IT support is security response
vCISO/advisory Program leadership, risk and governance work No experienced owner coordinates priorities Engineering hours and out-of-hours operations Expecting advisory meetings to clear alerts
Penetration testing Authorized assessment of scoped exposure You need validated weaknesses and remediation evidence Retest, implementation and continuous monitoring Using a point-in-time test as permanent assurance
Incident-response retainer Access to specified incident expertise You need a defined route to surge support Activation, guaranteed availability, hours, scope Assuming a retainer includes every future cost
Recovery service/platform Backup, restoration and resilience capabilities Business continuity depends on recoverable systems Application dependencies and operating sign-off Treating backup success as recovery proof

Illustrative source anchors: Microsoft's endpoint product, Arctic Wolf's MDR offering, Ntiva's IT services, Truvantis's vCISO service, NetSPI's testing services, Kroll's cyber services and Rubrik's recovery platform.

Working view: explore the first table
Option

Security software, such as EDR

Work it is intended to cover
Technical collection, prevention and detection capabilities
When it fits
Your team can configure, investigate and respond
Work to verify separately
Staffing, identity/cloud coverage, forensic support
Common buying mistake
Assuming automation means staffed ownership

Sources cited on this page

  1. Microsoft's endpoint product ↗microsoft.com
  2. Arctic Wolf's MDR offering ↗arcticwolf.com
  3. Ntiva's IT services ↗ntiva.com
  4. Truvantis's vCISO service ↗truvantis.com
  5. NetSPI's testing services ↗netspi.com
  6. Kroll's cyber services ↗kroll.com
  7. Rubrik's recovery platform ↗rubrik.com
Open the section source register →
SEARCH RESPONSE TERMS

Search across research, decision checks and provider categories.