Cybersecurity buying researchUse a 0–4 evidence scale. Rate what exists for the required scope rather than the best demonstration a vendor can show.
| Rating | Evidence anchor |
|---|---|
| 0 | No usable evidence, or materially fails the requirement |
| 1 | Verbal claim, brochure or unsupported plan |
| 2 | Written scope and credible design, but important validation or contractual detail remains |
| 3 | Relevant evidence demonstrated; responsibilities and material commitments documented |
| 4 | Rating 3 plus reproducible acceptance evidence, well-defined exceptions and continuing buyer visibility |
A contract is not the correct evidence for every fact, and a demo is not the correct evidence for every commitment. Record both where needed. If a criterion contains several requirements, a material unmet requirement prevents a high rating even when another subcomponent is impressive.
Working view: explore the first table
Rating
0
- Evidence anchor
- No usable evidence, or materially fails the requirement
Sources cited on this page
No external source is linked directly in this page.
Open the section source register →